Share on Facebook Self-managed teams and cross-functional teams share teamwork traits such as a collective performance goal, a positive synergy focus, and both mutual and individual accountability, but this is where the similarity ends.
In this situation, face-to-face meetings are difficult if team members are located in different parts of the world. Virtual teams allow distant team members to work together while managing different aspects of a project that require diverse skills.
Although working with global team members presents many challenges, there are several benefits to working with virtual teams and participating in virtual meetings that make it a worthwhile consideration in business.
Benefits of Virtual Teams Cultural Perspectives — Cultural perspectives prove to be a strong asset in virtual teams. Business negotiation, communication, and leadership skills are different depending on the culture, providing an opportunity to learn from and utilize differences while discovering similarities.
Diverse Knowledge and Skills — Team work brings out the unique knowledge and skills of each member. These diverse skills sets can strengthen project outcomes while giving member the change to learn from one another.
Open Communication — Virtual communication allows team members to speak freely on problems or difficulties that arise during the project. Location Flexibility — In virtual teams, members can provide their work from any location, making it easy to contribute to project goals and outcomes.
Another benefit of working with virtual teams is to be able to communicate quickly when big changes or problems arise. As they often do, shifts in deadlines, responsibilities, team restructuring or a temporary hold on the project can occur.
In those instances virtual meetings are an asset versus face-to-face meetings. When to Meet Face-to-Face At the onset, virtual teams are a great way to keep project management on track. Over time, the project may begin to suffer if the team experiences a breakdown in communication.
There are several reasons why communication breakdown occurs and it is linked to the beneficial factors of working with virtual teams.
In that case the following occurs: At that point it is important to opt for a face-to-face meeting to re-organize, re-strategize and gain a new understanding and respect for the team.
Without this important action, the project may suffer if communication is difficult for all team members involved. Benefits of Meeting in Person When deciding on a virtual meeting versus a face-to-face meeting, the advantages of working with a virtual team can out way the difficulties.
Much can be gained from a face-to-face meeting, most of which revolve around team building. Final Tips and Recommendations Meet early on in the project cycle: It is recommended that virtual or distributed teams make time to have a face-to-face meeting early in the project to establish leadership and delegation of roles and responsibilities.
Whether it is teleconferencing, using online chat rooms or videoconferencing, try to establish weekly meeting times to check in with team members and stay on track.
If this is not feasible, bi-weekly email or network communications may be the way to go. If time allows, set up a social networking group where team initiative are posted and communications are centralized in one place.
Track roles and responsibilities: By giving each team member the opportunity to track their responsibilities in the project life cycle, the project stays on track while team members support one another when goals, deadlines or issues arise.
In this way, team communication stays strong and members rely on one another for clarification and support. Kirkman, Benson Rosen, Paul E.
Meeting the Ethical Challenges of Leadership: Casting a Light or Shadow. Third Edition, July 23, Northhouse, Dr.
Fifth Edition, October 6, virtual teams and face to face teams on the basis of certain dimensions such as group style, performance, satisfaction, trust, cohesion and conflict.
Keywords- Face to face teams, collocated teams, dispersed teams, traditional teams, virtual teams. No ashio-midori.com 2 | Page Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature significant differences were obtained between the two types of teams with respect to work output satisfaction.
The traditional teams are also known as conventional or co-located or collocated teams. The article discusses the major differences between traditional teams and virtual teams.
Project Management; Production & Operations Management; They strike rapport with each other when they interact face-to-face. In the virtual team the interactions. Virtual teams versus face to face teams: A review of literature The paper also builds on a comparison between virtual teams and face to face teams on the basis of certain dimensions such as group style, performance, practical academic project.
Members in face to face teams were more satisfied with the quality of team working. Cross-functional teams that have the opportunity to work together on more than one project can begin to behave more like self-managed teams in this regard and will move more rapidly toward objectives.
Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* Though virtual and face-to-face teams exhibit similar levels of communication effec- project- oriented teamwork of the sort that is important in most real-world organizations”.